Yogi18’s Blog

Just another WordPress.com weblog

Auditing and Assurance (KKP1-4)

  1. What specific client-related matters prompted Goldstein and Morris’s decision to conceal certain information from the PCAOB?

G&M

2. What sanctions were imposed on the firm, the managing partner, and the two other partners involved in the investigation? Were these sanctions fair?

To protect of investors and further the public interest in the preparation of informative, fair, and independent audit reports, the Board determines it appropriate to impose the sanctions agreed to in the respondent’s offers. Accordingly, it is hereby ordered that:

–          Pursuant to Section 105(c)(4)(A) of the Act and PCAOB Rule 5300(a)(1), Goldstein & Morris, CPAs, P.C’s regristration with the Board is revoked; and

–          Pursuant to Section 105(c)(4)(B) of the Act and PCAOB rule 5300(a)(2), Edward B. Morris is barred from being an associated person of a regristered public accounting firm, as that term is defined in Section 2(a)(9) of the Act and PCAOB Rule 1001(p)(i).

http://www.pcaobus.org/Enforcement/Disciplinary_Proceedings/index.aspx

05-24_Goldstein_and_Morris.pdf

Februari 3, 2010 - Posted by | tugas Audit 2

Belum ada komentar.

Tinggalkan Balasan

Isikan data di bawah atau klik salah satu ikon untuk log in:

Logo WordPress.com

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Logout / Ubah )

Gambar Twitter

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Logout / Ubah )

Foto Facebook

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Logout / Ubah )

Foto Google+

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Logout / Ubah )

Connecting to %s

%d blogger menyukai ini: